geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Micro-G
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:38:17 GMT
What I have now is dependent upon geronimo-boilerplate-minimal (same as 
the minimal tomcat assembly which I cloned and used as a starting point).

Joe


Jason Dillon wrote:
> How is this new assembly going to work with the boilerplates?
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
>>
>> I didn't create a branch earlier because I didn't have experience  
>> doing that and thought I'd just start to play with my local build  (I 
>> know, not a good excuse but it's the truth).
>>
>> I was just getting to the point where I figured I should either  
>> create a branch or provide a patch for RTC when we made the switch  to 
>> CTR last week.
>>
>> Since it appears that there are no strong objections I'll go ahead  
>> and commit what I have later today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/25/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So far, I've been doing this on my local image.  I would like to get
>>>> this code (incomplete as it currently is) checked into trunk to  better
>>>> manage the changes and to share the effort.  Is this considered a
>>>> "controversial change"?   Should I first provide a patch as it  
>>>> currently
>>>> stands so that folks can comment on it prior to a commit(ala RTC)?
>>>
>>> I wonder why you haven't been doing your experiments in a branch or
>>> the sandbox? You would surely avoid dealing with these troubles.
>>>
>>>> Should I go ahead and commit this new assembly and config updates?
>>>
>>> +0
>>> Jacek
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message