geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anita kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Micro-G
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:29:09 GMT


--- Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:

> 
> I've done some work on a new assembly that I've nicknamed "Micro-G"
> (I 
> know .. not very creative).  The name that I'm using under 
> geronimo/assemblies is "geronimo-framework".   This is intended to be
> a 
> new foundational assembly from which any customized Geronimo assembly
> 
> could be built by installing plugins we would provide (starting with 
> tomcat and jetty plugins).
> 
> Hopefully this could help us eliminate the need to provide so many 
> canned configurations with each release.  I'm pretty sure we would 
> probably still want to provide at least one full j2ee server 
> configuration that we certified against, but we could potentially
> drop 
> the little-G assemblies and hopefully avoid additional future
> assemblies 
> based upon different combinations of components in the works.
> 
> So far, I've been doing this on my local image.  I would like to get 
> this code (incomplete as it currently is) checked into trunk to
> better 
> manage the changes and to share the effort.  
    
    Yes, please go ahead.. and let me know if and how I can share the
effort.

thanks
Anita

Is this considered a 
> "controversial change"?   Should I first provide a patch as it
> currently 
> stands so that folks can comment on it prior to a commit(ala RTC)?
> 
> I'm inclined to just commit the code since it is relatively self 
> contained at the moment, safe, and can be easily reverted.  I think
> the 
> only controversial change thus far might be that I updated the
> default 
> port selections on the tomcat configuration so that if you install a 
> tomcat plugin on this framework assembly you will end up with the
> same 
> port configurations currently available on our existing tomcat 
> distributions.  Of course, this means that the default ports are no 
> longer conducive to running two web servers in the same
> configuration.
> 
> Should I go ahead and commit this new assembly and config updates?
> 
> Joe
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Mime
View raw message