geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anita kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: console & deployer dependencies
Date Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:23:25 GMT

> I'm not sure what the point is of listing it as "provided", if that's
> what we're currently doing.  I'm pretty sure it's not "provided" so
> we
> might as well either not list it or list it as a regular dependency.

     The scope=provided is used to enforce the build order for the
configs, i.e the console configs are not built before the jetty/tomcat
deployer configs are built in a multi config build. These cars are not
required in the classloader.


Thanks
Anita


> > >
> > > On 9/4/06, Bill Dudney <bdudney@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> The consoles (tomcat & jetty) are spewing warning messages like
> this;
> > >>
> > >> 08:00:18,511 WARN  [BasicProxyManager] Could not load interface
> > >> org.apache.geronimo.jetty.JettyWebAppContext in provided
> ClassLoader
> > >> for org.apache.geronimo.configs/welcome-jetty/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car?
> > >>
> J2EEApplication=null,j2eeType=WebModule,name=org.apache.geronimo.conf
> > >> igs
> > >> /welcome-jetty/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car
> > >>
> > >> To fix it we can simply remove the <scope>provided</scope>
from
> the
> > >> <artifactId>{jetty,tomcat}-deployer</artifactId> dependencies
in
> the
> > >> webconsole-{jetty,tomcat}/pom.xml.
> > >>
> > >> Could someone who knows more about the console than me please
> review
> > >> the patch (GERONIMO-2344.bdudney-2.patch) here;
> > >>
> > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344
> > >>
> > >> And apply it if it makes sense?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> -bd-
> > >>
> >
> >
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Mime
View raw message