geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Micro-G
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:26:41 GMT
+1. Go for it.

-- dims

On 9/25/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I didn't create a branch earlier because I didn't have experience doing
> that and thought I'd just start to play with my local build (I know, not
> a good excuse but it's the truth).
>
> I was just getting to the point where I figured I should either create a
> branch or provide a patch for RTC when we made the switch to CTR last week.
>
> Since it appears that there are no strong objections I'll go ahead and
> commit what I have later today.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> > On 9/25/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> So far, I've been doing this on my local image.  I would like to get
> >> this code (incomplete as it currently is) checked into trunk to better
> >> manage the changes and to share the effort.  Is this considered a
> >> "controversial change"?   Should I first provide a patch as it currently
> >> stands so that folks can comment on it prior to a commit(ala RTC)?
> >
> >
> > I wonder why you haven't been doing your experiments in a branch or
> > the sandbox? You would surely avoid dealing with these troubles.
> >
> >> Should I go ahead and commit this new assembly and config updates?
> >
> >
> > +0
> >
> > Jacek
> >
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

Mime
View raw message