Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4360 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2006 23:13:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2006 23:13:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 11545 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 23:13:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10908 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 23:13:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10897 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2006 23:13:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:13:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:13:15 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c29so195081nfb for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:12:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G5iTGuJqAevrYkkiPeLSsb0i5jhDASaNgSAq5hPfGjnH8SZV37W8rLOPE9X+HxYMjXsDwCMAARY8a25T1fgk1lDm3VW4mc6oz1JLCK7VRjlXrj4kve6paZb+Vsq12LbUl2yq55gCD/1oXBG0+BBUjKrYS9YPHpBCikac7SBB1yM= Received: by 10.49.93.13 with SMTP id v13mr1181299nfl; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.85.1 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:12:52 +0200 From: "Guillaume Nodet" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1 In-Reply-To: <8FC358E2-9C2E-467D-ADF1-F2A5B9E24110@planet57.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29941_21906262.1156288372680" References: <03B2DAF5-E391-4FBC-9D49-C097E1FFF890@planet57.com> <637017E1-0BA4-4A5F-B838-EAACE3E7879A@planet57.com> <1152A5E2-D72D-425B-B24A-9DDB237BE2A7@planet57.com> <8FC358E2-9C2E-467D-ADF1-F2A5B9E24110@planet57.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_29941_21906262.1156288372680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > > Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done right now > and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2. > It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there is no bugs. But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the plugin. > Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to include a plugin, which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ? I'd prefer to keep this code in our tree and in the 1.1 branch. > > --jason > > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I'm not convinced. > First, i'm not sure it will make it in 1.1.1, and then, we would not be > able > to easily release new versions of the plugin if needed. > > I would prefer if it was in another location than the 1.1 or 1.1.1 branch. > What about http://svn.sourceforge.net/gplugins/ > where some geronimo plugins are ? It would be a good fit, as the G plugins > will need it. > > On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > Thats fine with me... just put it into branches/1.1... no need to > > > have a separate tree under devtools for this. > > > > > > How / when will it be released if I put it in branches/1.1 ? > > > It uses m2 and the 1.1 branch uses m1, so the release process > > > will have to include that. > > > > I'd just have the m1 build spin up m2 to build the m2 plugins... > > > > or add it to the release process... so you release server server with > > m1 and then the plugins with m2. > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------=_Part_29941_21906262.1156288372680 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.

It's done and it works for my plugins.  That does not mean there is no bugs.

But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the plugin.

Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to include a plugin,
which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?

I'd prefer to keep this code in our tree and in the 1.1 branch.

--jason


On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

I'm not convinced.
First, i'm not sure it will make it in 1.1.1, and then, we would not be able
to easily release new versions of the plugin if needed.

I would prefer if it was in another location than the 1.1 or 1.1.1 branch.
What about http://svn.sourceforge.net/gplugins/
where some geronimo plugins are ? It would be a good fit, as the G plugins
will need it.

On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Thats fine with me... just put it into branches/1.1... no need to
> have a separate tree under devtools for this.
>
> How / when will it be released if I put it in branches/1.1 ?
> It uses m2 and the 1.1 branch uses m1, so the release process
> will have to include that.

I'd just have the m1 build spin up m2 to build the m2 plugins...

or add it to the release process... so you release server server with
m1 and then the plugins with m2.

--jason







--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet ------=_Part_29941_21906262.1156288372680--