Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-35398-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 52684 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2006 15:24:30 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2006 15:24:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 5051 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2006 15:24:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5014 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2006 15:24:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5002 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2006 15:24:26 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:24:26 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:24:25 -0700
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l36so2389176nfa
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=colIAss66wy3lRQPgBgZsxZrUMYT4HdQWWB+1wpOyGogDEGjxkKvI+eEDYkhXa3W7j0hjKMLyQtcbo7FLXM8OdGCpFewFnFJGgtvrmSCZPq9vk19I9jS5mMOlveWn6UQremTHNhJk+541/nUFHGXcQJJOtlDoT2k9uIBsqW2OpU=
Received: by 10.49.26.18 with SMTP id d18mr2231913nfj;
        Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.37.4 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 08:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b23ecedc0608070824l56e48243s383cf41dd9f93585@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:24:03 +0200
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gnodet@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2
In-Reply-To: <44D75323.1070704@toolazydogs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_42772_24853357.1154964243590"
References: <44D75323.1070704@toolazydogs.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

------=_Part_42772_24853357.1154964243590
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a "Wish" for
which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode.  RTC should also be applied to documentation, so why
were these issue types excluded
from the workflow ?
I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize issues if
they do not have the same workflow.

On 8/7/06, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Previously, this was set up so that only new features and improvements
> followed the RTC flow.  Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
> Does anyone know why this was changed?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

------=_Part_42772_24853357.1154964243590
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a &quot;Wish&quot; for which i provided a patch but was unable<br>to put it in RTC mode.&nbsp; RTC should also be applied to documentation, so why were these issue types excluded
<br>from the workflow ?<br>I think the main problem is that you can not easily recategorize issues if they do not have the same workflow.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alan D. Cabrera
</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:list@toolazydogs.com">list@toolazydogs.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Previously, this was set up so that only new features and improvements
<br>followed the RTC flow.&nbsp;&nbsp;Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.<br>Does anyone know why this was changed?<br><br><br>Regards,<br>Alan<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Cheers,<br>Guillaume Nodet

------=_Part_42772_24853357.1154964243590--