Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.195 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=RHqu0iHQ6XXqg+wCcYJKdP1cJl1rcTy4imz+BZieCQKE8i7tmMfJ6iHbhnVfMANfODUrZxxG1gdODVF+DAgjXDD6TkA5Q81b8B+0EmqXJdyiUNPWS00V4pTkcYeBxBwcxGbvFsRPQ6g2Ize6otMri9JbPFqgux53/sQOcAsgkjc=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50608311531i7c4fd0f1kce1ea0789dae878e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F94D4E73-55B8-4FB5-BE9A-5FE2856AE875@planet57.com>
 <1b5bfeb50608300438t4eccfe3brb155336455af823d@mail.gmail.com>
 <17AC4DD6-308E-414B-9BA2-38A58B42BDE7@planet57.com>
 <1b5bfeb50608311459x3982f93fh809a191747ca21a9@mail.gmail.com>
 <04EE8C7D-C5CF-46AF-8B5B-D1402B913B50@planet57.com>
 <1b5bfeb50608311531i7c4fd0f1kce1ea0789dae878e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8797782B-44CF-44B7-AAD0-44C2F2F3C83E@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrade Derby to 10.1.3.1?
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:39:03 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

You really want a diff of the root pom that changes the version to  
10.1.3.1 to review?

I can do that, but it seems like a waste of time... and abuse of the  
RTC concept.

If no one objects to it, then why don't we just do it?  Its  a  
whopping 1 line change... which affects only 2 chars :-P

--jason


On Aug 31, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 9/1/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> A formal RTC... don't think that is needed... my plan was to post the
>> topic to the list, and if no one objected, to create a tracker JIRA
>> and the commit.
>>
>> I think that follows lazy-consensus... and IMO is all that is needed
>> for a minor change like this.
>
> Well, we're still in the RTC hug and until it changes we need to  
> obey the rules.
>
> On the other hand, if it's a trivial change, RTC is going to happen
> very quickly. Come on Jason, you did a great job of pushing the m2
> changes out of the door (i.e. having applied them to trunk) and was
> profoundly patient and now you say you can't manage such a small
> change?! Can't be! ;-)
>
> Jacek
>
> -- 
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.net.pl