Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=SmV89BMMOnmackiI1y76jjYMzCTnO4jaGEqMcPjr73PiIWgNVEaNx7DnnTvKMvT8/uIaCgYLgPoGzdkLMqDeZ/OrCwIMi7Ee1yalopmdtx8RyZ2ahr2x8rMmK0FemAdCCr2FKdEZs6MXd7RHj/Dynu1m69RBr6jLh0zEX41jno4=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: 
 <296718BFC6B9E94FB0A809F55834237A03C971F9@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
References: 
 <296718BFC6B9E94FB0A809F55834237A03C971F9@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <82D28500-1602-44DD-8FF6-71D552536471@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: Yoko and Geronimo
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:02:58 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

That is just to put the jar into a dir, which the system property  
java.endorsed.dirs points to?

--jason


On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:

> If the ORB wants to be 3.0 compliant, then yes...  
> java.endorsed.dirs is
> the preferred way that sun wants to follow for these cases...
>
> - Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ammulder@gmail.com [mailto:ammulder@gmail.com] On Behalf Of  
> Aaron
> Mulder
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:08 PM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Yoko and Geronimo
>
> Are you saying that every open source and commercial ORB that wants to
> run under JDK 1.5.0 requires one of these two approaches?  That no one
> has come up with a workaround that doesn't require user intervention?
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 8/11/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <bravi@iona.com> wrote:
>> The JDK class
>>
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/PortableInterceptor/ 
> IORI
>>
> nterceptor_3_0Operations.html#adapter_manager_state_changed(int,% 
> 20short
>> )
>>
>> doesn't correctly implement the corba 3.0 spec... This method should
>> have a string as the manager ID.
>>
>> Anyways, there are 2 ways to handle this...
>>
>> 1) java.endorsed.dirs setting
>> 2) xbootclasspath
>>
>> - Balaji
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ammulder@gmail.com [mailto:ammulder@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Aaron
>> Mulder
>> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:57 AM
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Yoko and Geronimo
>>
>> On 8/11/06, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Any thoughts on how we should handle this particularly awkward
>> situation?
>>
>> I vote "we" (e.g. Yoko) do whatever it takes to avoid the class
>> conflict, and then Geronimo can forget about the JVM ORB forever.
>>
>> Do "we" know how other open source ORBs handle the conflict?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>      Aaron
>>
>>
>