Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44ED0061.5000409@Golux.Com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:26:57 -0400
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com>
Reply-To: coar@apache.org
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation; Open Source Initiative
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review?
References: <44EB8CF2.8080205@Golux.Com>
 <1b5bfeb50608231218m7759a6e8obf4eec5ca44e283c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50608231218m7759a6e8obf4eec5ca44e283c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> 
> Just run across a question - let me think out loud. I think it's not
> been answered yet. If only PMCers votes are binding and only when a
> change gets 3 +1's binding votes (i.e. PMCers) the change may be
> checked in, the question is what's the role of the commiters group?
> We've got 3 groups: the PMC, the committers and the community and I
> don't see how the committers are different from the community even
> though they've been armed with something that's I think is unusable?

The distinction you're drawing between the PMC and the committers
is an artificial one.  I among others think they should be
identical.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRO0AYZrNPMCpn3XdAQLeYgP/aqdZM4lqzE4hS1Dty86/xi27lgOJ7L06
Pt+tJCWKLt2Txj84rrXGvCExVhmk5RXxSTXdaTLO2sLIwmhFC4a8oj6ZkYi6DfzQ
lZnniciJ1DAiD3eGHSBXwX/pY2ZfKbznnJvrZWAzUOkmof3GGq31pFYT5phjZbfM
2qLHWQ/6FTM=
=22ir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----