Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25522 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 18:01:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 18:01:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 97673 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2006 18:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97506 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2006 18:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97495 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2006 18:01:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:01:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.46.63] (HELO as.toolazydogs.com) (72.10.46.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:01:15 -0700 Received: (qmail 15493 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 11:00:38 -0700 Received: from c-24-7-76-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?172.16.226.42?) (24.7.76.123) by toolazydogs.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 11:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: <44E9F4C1.8070206@toolazydogs.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:00:33 -0700 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: RTC don't ship any sun schemas or dtds - GERONIMO-2332 References: <10AAA656-1BA7-413B-8C07-53A16DFA2A26@yahoo.com> <5157AE77-8822-4E5A-A54E-E51C00FE4D9D@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Can we go back to the root of the problem which is the distribution of the schemas? This may have already been put to bed but, can't we get permission from Sun to distribute these puppies? Regards, Alan Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Why not publish the src jar in addition to the binary? > > -dain > > On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: > >> I've thought about this some more and have some major reservations >> about this approach. >> >> - The generated code wont have apache headers, so we can't actually >> check in into svn. There might be a way to fix this with a script of >> some kind. >> >> - More seriously, this will eliminate traceability to the source >> schema. Sun has in the past fixed errors in the schema without >> changing anything that can be recognized from the generated source. >> (I think they changed a date in a comment). This is a major problem >> IMNSHO. >> >> So, I think we need to keep the source schemas in svn. One way to do >> this would be to move this module into the tck project and publish >> the binary jar from there. If we found a way to change the headers >> we might be able to publish a source jar too. >> >> So, I'm -0.999 on this proposal at the moment... I think we need to >> find a way to get the source schemas into svn. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Aug 19, 2006, at 9:49 AM, David Jencks wrote: >> >>> GERONIMO-2332 didn't show up in the list of RTC issues sent out >>> today, and I don't see the "Begin RTC Review" button.... any ideas? >>> >>> Anyway, please vote so we can get this taken care of. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 18, 2006, at 4:15 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>> >>>> I've implemented the proposal to not ship any sun schemas or dtds >>>> to avoid licensing questions and to check in the xmlbeans generated >>>> files. >>>> >>>> Please vote promptly. >>>> >>>> I've provided patches for trunk and branches/1.1. I expect that >>>> the 1.1 patch should work for 1.1.1 also, I'm hoping someone else >>>> will check for me. >>>> >>>> Before releasing 1.1.1 including this work we'd have to release the >>>> proposed new specs jar with the generated xmlbeans classes in it: >>>> this would involve changing the version number to 1.0 in several >>>> places. >>>> >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2332 >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>> >