Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89772 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2006 02:59:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2006 02:59:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 30992 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 02:59:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30723 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 02:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30712 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2006 02:59:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:59:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.229] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:59:45 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1913618wxd for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:59:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=OTfBRRYQNQnK1YanRe2ASJxGgvmLwhn7Tbm2rQPvFs7MwQH9D9jfVrIDot/XjD1shl2gEfMjcwTPJdLiXYxNLfw9BuoUxfD2CsjmoTGsJJncHncdyvY3mTcoiwlZfRBTDM55CtvNEKOwknph++q3VI0jcj7a7VsoILA8YOTMcSI= Received: by 10.70.38.12 with SMTP id l12mr10525756wxl; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.123.103? ( [71.70.213.94]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g7sm6159972wra.2006.08.28.19.59.24; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <24918292-719B-4963-A814-5C565D6A6072@planet57.com> References: <1395807E-3A59-4E31-9B0C-7A704C090C5C@planet57.com> <74e15baa0608281257u7dbdda08k47b8c36956ffc3bf@mail.gmail.com> <8440C537-F9FA-4D81-89AB-955499AE39BB@gmail.com> <24918292-719B-4963-A814-5C565D6A6072@planet57.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <24BA75F8-DB7F-44D1-9BDF-C300846EB839@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevan Miller Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Genesis 1.0 to m2 central Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:59:22 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Aug 28, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > I did so to facilitate the release for xbean... > > I don't think that tagging before a vote is going to be the norm, > but I had committed to getting it done by today. I appreciate that, I applaud your efforts, and apologize if I'm being a PITA. However, we also have a responsibility as a community when releasing software. I'm trying to be sure we are addressing that responsibility. For instance, I see that genesis-1.0 includes a software license for Clover? News to me, but I confess that genesis has been a bit of an unknown to me... from Product: Clover License: Open Source License, 0.x, 1.x Issued: Sun May 14 2006 21:59:13 CDT Expiry: Never Maintenance Expiry: Never Key: 965016739f4031c43d67e61b0 Name: Jason Dillon Org: Apache Geronimo Clause 5 of the Clover license says "The Licensee may copy the Software for back-up purposes only. The Licensee may not assign or otherwise transfer the Software to any third party." IANAL ADNWTB, however, this gives me cause for concern. Can you explain what this is about? How is Groovy licensed? Do we need to include it in LICENSE and NOTICE file? bootstrap and bootstrap.bat should contain an APACHE LICENSE... --kevan > > On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:37 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: >> >>> The tag for 1.0 is made, and unless there is something major I'm >>> not going to modify it. >> >> So? The fact that you tagged a 1.0 (without, as far as I know, >> consulting the community), should not bear any weight in this >> discussion. >> >> --kevan >> >