geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:52:23 GMT
If possible I'd like to avoid any changes to specs/trunk until I have  
committed my changes to that tree.

I've got it 95% done in my local workspace... and if we start making  
changes to it now it will probably invalidate several hours of work :-(

--jason


On Aug 20, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> A first step would be to put the new version of the spec in
>   specs/trunk/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
> or something like that.
>
> On 8/21/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I've implemented the jta 1.1 feature locally and want to do the  
>> ejb 3/
>> jpa container managed persistence stuff.  Where should I put it?
>>
>> jta 1.1 adds one interface to jta 1.0.1B with AFAICT no other changes
>> (I haven't actually been able to locate the spec, just the javadoc).
>> Anyone know if we can run the j2ee 1.4 tck using jee5 spec jars?
>
> Not sure, but if the signatures of the package are different, it  
> may cause
> some problems, and adding an interface may be considered as a non
> compliant change.
>
> If this is the case, it will be difficult to have JEE 5 parts in a  
> J2EE 1.4
> certified server.
>
>>
>> If not, I think we'll have to do something like copy the tm module to
>> somewhere else for jee5 work.  Maybe a copy of tm in sandbox?  I
>> worry about getting out of sync with m2 related reorganizations.
>
> I think only the spec would lead to problems.  The implementation
> may be able to work with a 1.0.1 spec, as soon as the implementation
> of TransactionSynchronizationRegistry is not loaded.
>
>>
>> My first guess at the CMP is to do most of the work in the tm module.
>> but I might change my mind at any time.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet


Mime
View raw message