geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Specs organization, versioning, and releasing
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:23:28 GMT
On Aug 21, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> PROPOSAL:
>> 1.  Each spec will no longer be split up into trunk+branches+tags.  
>> There will instead be one trunk+branches+tags for all specs laid  
>> out as follows:
>>     specs/trunk/pom.xml
>>     specs/trunk/<artifactId>
>>     specs/tags/<artifactId>-<version>
>>     specs/branches/
>
> What is the layout for branches?  Right now it is the major version  
> with all the specs underneath it.  For instance, there is 1_1,  
> 1_1_1 (not sure why we use _'s here and .'s elsewhere).  branches  
> would follow the same layout like:
>
> specs/branches/geronimo-activation_1.0.2/1_1 as opposed to specs/ 
> branches/1_1/geronimo-activation_1.0.2.
>
> Or do you intend to leave branches alone?

I don't plan to touch branches for now... if I did do something I  
would change '_' to '.'

I think that we need to evaluate how to best organize branches based  
on the new release scheme when it comes time to need a branch.

--jason



Mime
View raw message