geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Publish Genesis 1.0 to m2 central
Date Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:57:29 GMT
FYI, the reason why I said the tag has been made... is that the maven  
release plugin handled that... and now that since trunk is 1.1- 
SNAPSHOT, using the release plugin again would result in a 1.1  
release, not a re-tag of 1.0... which I am find to do if that is what  
we want.

IMO, this is not a typical release that needs to be installed and  
tested as does the server... and I would like to continue using the  
release plugin to facilitate this.  I think it is fine to release to  
m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository, vote on that release and then publish...  
since the sync to central is a manual process anyways.


On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> On Aug 28, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> I did so to facilitate the release for xbean...
>> I don't think that tagging before a vote is going to be the norm,  
>> but I had committed to getting it done by today.
> I appreciate that, I applaud your efforts, and apologize if I'm  
> being a PITA. However, we also have a responsibility as a community  
> when releasing software. I'm trying to be sure we are addressing  
> that responsibility.
> For instance, I see that genesis-1.0 includes a software license  
> for Clover? News to me, but I confess that genesis has been a bit  
> of an unknown to me...
> from
> Product: Clover
> License: Open Source License, 0.x, 1.x
> Issued: Sun May 14 2006 21:59:13 CDT
> Expiry: Never
> Maintenance Expiry: Never
> Key: 965016739f4031c43d67e61b0
> Name: Jason Dillon
> Org: Apache Geronimo
> Clause 5 of the Clover license says "The Licensee may copy the  
> Software for back-up purposes only. The Licensee may not assign or  
> otherwise transfer the Software to any third party." IANAL ADNWTB,  
> however, this gives me cause for concern. Can you explain what this  
> is about?
> How is Groovy licensed? Do we need to include it in LICENSE and  
> NOTICE file?
> bootstrap and bootstrap.bat should contain an APACHE LICENSE...
> --kevan
>> On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:37 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>> The tag for 1.0 is made, and unless there is something major I'm  
>>>> not going to modify it.
>>> So? The fact that you tagged a 1.0 (without,  as far as I know,  
>>> consulting the community), should not bear any weight in this  
>>> discussion.
>>> --kevan

View raw message