geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Independently version transaction and connector
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:21:33 GMT
On Aug 9, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I am not against moving transaction and connector bits to separate  
> peer trees... I am just trying to avoid us moving all modules to  
> separate trees which would be a massive painful nightmare.  But, I  
> think that splitting off large/major chunks of G into versioned  
> trees is the right direction... just need to make sure it does not  
> get out of hand.

Right, that would be a rather big mess.  The idea isn't even to start  
splitting off chunks for "chunk splitting" sake, more that these two  
pieces have significant stability, can stand on their own, and have  
merit in other projects.

-David

> --jason
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>>> What do everyone think about changing the transaction and  
>>> connector modules to be versioned independently of the main  
>>> Geronimo server?
>>>
>>> -dain
>>
>


Mime
View raw message