geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Mulder" <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: JPA Plugin Status
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:05:08 GMT
On 8/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> David,
>
> I am releasing the specs as a 1.1.1 release due to some changes in jacc.  Do you want
to include the
> changes to JPA there?

For my 2 cents, that would be great!

Thanks,
     Aaron

> David Blevins wrote:
> > I got OpenJPA to run with my JPA code.  So we're looking real good.
> >
> > On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >
> >> So far, it's just got a TopLink provider, but if people want to copy
> >> that to create providers for Cayenne or OpenJPA or whatever, that
> >> would be great.  It basically just needs to have a customized name and
> >> ClassPath, though I'm assuming any provider we integrate with will be
> >> compatible with the Geronimo JPA spec JAR (currently
> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/jar)
> >
> > OpenJPA and the Geronimo JPA spec jar weren't happy.  Our JPA jar had
> > some bad signatures and was missing a few exception classes.  I fixed
> > those and managed to get OpenJPA to compile and run with our JPA jar
> > rather than the CDDL version they use.
> >
> >> If you try to build and run this, you'll be held up by a couple things:
> >
> > For me its:
> >  - Still missing the some JNDI stuff Dain is working on (mentioned
> > earlier in the thread).
> >  - Need the plugin goop
> >
> > But when that is there, this should run for ejbs or servlets in 1.1.1
> > and maybe 1.1 (should work).
> >
> >> My goal is to have a release of this plugin with sufficient user
> >> documentation when G 1.1.1 is released.  It would be great to have
> >> some open source JPA providers for that release too.
> >>
> >> I also started talking to David B about the JPA work being done in
> >> OpenEJB, and I think we're agreed that we probably don't need two such
> >> plugins for G 1.1.x, so hopefully we can work toward a unification as
> >> we move forward.
> >
> > I'm sure we can figure something out.  I'll give it some more thought
> > tomorrow, time for bed now....zzzzZZZZ
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message