geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Mulder" <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: Yoko and Geronimo
Date Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:08:19 GMT
Are you saying that every open source and commercial ORB that wants to
run under JDK 1.5.0 requires one of these two approaches?  That no one
has come up with a workaround that doesn't require user intervention?

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 8/11/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <bravi@iona.com> wrote:
> The JDK class
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/PortableInterceptor/IORI
> nterceptor_3_0Operations.html#adapter_manager_state_changed(int,%20short
> )
>
> doesn't correctly implement the corba 3.0 spec... This method should
> have a string as the manager ID.
>
> Anyways, there are 2 ways to handle this...
>
> 1) java.endorsed.dirs setting
> 2) xbootclasspath
>
> - Balaji
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ammulder@gmail.com [mailto:ammulder@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Aaron
> Mulder
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:57 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Yoko and Geronimo
>
> On 8/11/06, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
> > Any thoughts on how we should handle this particularly awkward
> situation?
>
> I vote "we" (e.g. Yoko) do whatever it takes to avoid the class
> conflict, and then Geronimo can forget about the JVM ORB forever.
>
> Do "we" know how other open source ORBs handle the conflict?
>
> Thanks,
>      Aaron
>
>

Mime
View raw message