geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Terminology and status
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:11:38 GMT

On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query.   
> I'll assume the patches are in JIRA anyway and its a great place  
> for comments too :)

I was just looking into that.  I already send a report every monday  
of unassigned JIRAs that contain patches.  If i could get a list of  
the votes too, I should be able to cook up something.

-David


> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> People have been referring to things requiring votes as
>> 'RTCs'.
>> Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner.  RTC is a
>> development model; what it and CTR are concerned with are
>> patches.  Please call them patches.  Changes are patches;
>> RTC and CTR are how they get applied.  If you said something
>> about 'an RTC' outside Geronimo, no-one would have the least
>> idea what you were talking about.  This is *not* a place
>> where it's necessary for us to invent new nomenclature.
>> There has been some discussion about keeping status in
>> the wiki.  The wiki is a 'pull' mechanism; if you don't
>> actively go looking for it, you won't get it.  I have
>> updated the STATUS file in trunk from its incubation
>> content to something more current, and have set it up to
>> be mailed to the list every Wednesday night.  I suggest
>> filling things in there so all the various issues are
>> listed in a single places, along with who has voted on
>> patches, critical issues, etc.  Right now information is
>> scattered all over the place.
>> Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/hzwes (or at
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
>> if you prefer the full URL) to see how another project
>> uses the STATUS file as a central repository of such
>> info.
>> If the consensus is to not use the STATUS file, that's
>> cool.  But I decided that *doing* it was more productive
>> that just proposing to possibly set it up.
>> - --
>> #ken	P-)}
>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
>> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>> iQCVAwUBRNDmpZrNPMCpn3XdAQKWpgP+L6fVMia9/QIb/QRX6Q9PvW3GI7+TFTMe
>> 2feNTUraxSxuKY2CT3Bk8m8s2H/iObbgt+ILidYnKXMU8FKEFW2nCzZBPpCEi1cO
>> CaawPX7PhMltfhbaJquR4qZM1VRUxd2YfyDzvJEYIbP1c166TgV5Q4FZjnt8lFJR
>> 96KAuOpSqTI=
>> =W2iC
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>


Mime
View raw message