geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Drop the m1 build
Date Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:19:57 GMT
Its probably important to note that if the TCK passes against an m1  
build of 1.2, that does not mean that it will also pass against an m2  
build.

So, I don't see any reason to keep m1 around anymore.

  * * *

Kevan, what needs to be done to get the TCK runnable against the m2  
build of 1.2?

--jason


On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> It definitely impacts aspects of TCK. Agreed that it's important  
> that we hear from the people who are going to get those aspects of  
> the TCK working... ;-)
>
> At this point, I don't see any harm in dropping m1. It's not going  
> to add any additional work and will drive our adoption of m2...
>
> --kevan
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> I am all for dropping the m1 build too...
>>
>> But I think the people who run the TCK should speak up first as  
>> this may
>> impact them significantly...
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>> I propose we remove the m1 build.  It has been broken for  
>>>> several days
>>>> now and no one has noticed.  Here is my vote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 to remove the m1 build
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>


Mime
View raw message