geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: RTC don't ship any sun schemas or dtds - GERONIMO-2332
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:00:33 GMT
Can we go back to the root of the problem which is the distribution of 
the schemas?  This may have already been put to bed but, can't we get 
permission from Sun to distribute these puppies?


Regards,
Alan

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Why not publish the src jar in addition to the binary?
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've thought about this some more and have some major reservations 
>> about this approach.
>>
>> - The generated code wont have apache headers, so we can't actually 
>> check in into svn.  There might be a way to fix this with a script of 
>> some kind.
>>
>> - More seriously, this will eliminate traceability to the source 
>> schema.  Sun has in the past fixed errors in the schema without 
>> changing anything that can be recognized from the generated source.  
>> (I think they changed a date in a comment).  This is a major problem 
>> IMNSHO.
>>
>> So, I think we need to keep the source schemas in svn.  One way to do 
>> this would be to move this module into the tck project and publish 
>> the binary jar from there.  If we found a way to change the headers 
>> we might be able to publish a source jar too.
>>
>> So, I'm -0.999 on this proposal at the moment... I think we need to 
>> find a way to get the source schemas into svn.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2006, at 9:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> GERONIMO-2332 didn't show up in the list of RTC issues sent out 
>>> today, and I don't see the "Begin RTC Review" button.... any ideas?
>>>
>>> Anyway, please vote so we can get this taken care of.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 18, 2006, at 4:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've implemented the proposal to not ship any sun schemas or dtds 
>>>> to avoid licensing questions and to check in the xmlbeans generated 
>>>> files.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote promptly.
>>>>
>>>> I've provided patches for trunk and branches/1.1.  I expect that 
>>>> the 1.1 patch should work for 1.1.1 also, I'm hoping someone else 
>>>> will check for me.
>>>>
>>>> Before releasing 1.1.1 including this work we'd have to release the 
>>>> proposed new specs jar with the generated xmlbeans classes in it: 
>>>> this would involve changing the version number to 1.0 in several 
>>>> places.
>>>>
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2332
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>
>


Mime
View raw message