geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <>
Subject Re: Independently version transaction and connector
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:35:31 GMT

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> I can see the difficulty pointed out by Jason and the benefit raised 
>> by Dain.  I've never liked versioning parts of Geronimo that rarely 
>> change and am all for making things more consumable externally.
>> The proposal as it stands is fairly generic.  Is the idea to relocate 
>> Tx Manager and Connector to be top-level projects withing Geronimo and 
>> build separately or some kind of hybrid in the current tree.  If we 
>> are going to release them independently then I think they should be 
>> top-level in Geronimo (and I know thats a lot more work).
> I wanted to get a general sense before discussing the details, since 
> there would be no point if were against independent versioning.  I was 
> thinking we should put each them in a tree which is a peer to Geronimo 
> trunk.  I also think we should generally only use released versions of 
> the jars in Geronimo (i.e., no snapshots) for two reasons 1) it is much 
> easier to maintain from a build perspective and 2) is will push us to do 
> more frequent releases of them.

Not sure I understand the last statement. (no snapshots)

> -dain

View raw message