geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject [Discuss] How do we assess new function. (was Re: Patches in RTC (Geronimo - 2006-08-10))
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:16:57 GMT
I think that partially will be based on whether the current patch needs to be reworked or the

community does not want to incorporate the idea.  I think the points you brought up are valid
and 
that the current patch needs to be reworked to address the issues.

I'll add my comments to the JIRA.  One thing we should probably clarify is how much should
the 
person adding the patch be required to do.  I think incrementally the patch does bring better

information to the table and would be a net benefit.  Your suggestions are an improvement
over what 
is there.

In a similar vein you proposed a quartz plugin and wanted to use GBeans for the config (I
don't 
remember the exact discussion) and others suggested a database would be better.  In the end
you 
chose to not take other people's ideas into your proposed design (which was fine).  I think
your 
comment was if others wanted to augment the code they were free to.

I see some similarity here in that this isn't what everyone would want but its better than
what we 
had so I think the discussion is are you or others willing to work on your proposed enhancements.

If yes then we rework the patch and start again.  If not, we need to decide if this is better
than 
we were and others can improve it later.

I'd say that if this is better and no one wants to do the incremental work that we accept
this.

Thoughts?

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I've added a comment to GERONIMO-2248 indicating that I don't agree
> with the patch as proposed.  Now what?  Assuming I'm not overruled,
> does this issue stay on this list forever?  Is there some way to "end
> RTC" if the concensus is that the issue should not proceed?
> 
> Also, I'm trusting people to read the comments on the issue -- there's
> no way to see from this message whether someone has objected to a
> patch, you only see the positive votes.
> 
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
> 
> On 10 Aug 2006 15:12:00 -0000, dblevins@apache.org <dblevins@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>> Geronimo - Thursday, August 10, 2006
>>
>>   7 Patches in RTC
>>
>>     [XBEAN-19] [RTC] Enable inverse classloading with the classpath 
>> element
>>       - Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
>>       - Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>>       - Created:  Fri Jun 16 14:13:24 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Wed Aug 09 10:30:04 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 4
>>           1  Dain Sundstrom
>>           2  David Blevins
>>           3  Jeff Genender
>>           4  Matt Hogstrom
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-19
>>
>>     [GERONIMO-2015] Let's replace JKS to PKCS12 key store type
>>       - Assignee: Unassigned
>>       - Reporter: Nikolay Chugunov
>>       - Created:  Fri May 12 14:54:17 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Thu Aug 10 06:54:09 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 0
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015
>>
>>     [GERONIMO-1563] [RTC] Make the JACC implementation pluggable
>>       - Assignee: David Jencks
>>       - Reporter: David Jencks
>>       - Created:  Wed Feb 01 02:26:12 PST 2006
>>       - Updated:  Wed Aug 09 12:11:15 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 5
>>           1  Alan Cabrera
>>           2  Donald Woods
>>           3  Gianny Damour
>>           4  Jeff Genender
>>           5  Matt Hogstrom
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1563
>>
>>     [GERONIMO-2163] WADI Integration for Jetty
>>       - Assignee: Gianny Damour
>>       - Reporter: Gianny Damour
>>       - Created:  Sun Jul 02 14:16:35 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Fri Aug 04 12:03:16 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 0
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163
>>
>>     [XBEAN-33] [RTC] Add a new Wiki source generator that generates 
>> wiki markup so that reference docs can be pasted into confluence.
>>       - Assignee: Hiram Chirino
>>       - Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>>       - Created:  Tue Aug 01 13:03:57 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Wed Aug 09 15:58:47 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 5
>>           1  Dain Sundstrom
>>           2  David Blevins
>>           3  Guillaume Nodet
>>           4  Jeff Genender
>>           5  Matt Hogstrom
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-33
>>
>>     [XBEAN-31] [RTC] it would be great if the m2 plugin would 
>> automatically add the XSD and .xsd.html files as artifacts into the build
>>       - Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
>>       - Reporter: james strachan
>>       - Created:  Tue Aug 01 03:37:03 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Wed Aug 09 11:54:28 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 5
>>           1  Dain Sundstrom
>>           2  David Jencks
>>           3  Guillaume Nodet
>>           4  Jeff Genender
>>           5  Matt Hogstrom
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31
>>
>>     [GERONIMO-2248] Applications portlets: List Parent and Child 
>> components against each component
>>       - Assignee: Unassigned
>>       - Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
>>       - Created:  Sun Jul 30 08:15:34 PDT 2006
>>       - Updated:  Wed Aug 09 15:12:06 PDT 2006
>>       - Votes: 0
>>       - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248
>>
>>
>> NOTE: This email is generated and does not constitute and offical
>> vote or vote result.  All official voting is done on the dev list.
>>
>> If you do not see your issue here, click the "Begin RTC Review"
>> link under the "Available Workflow Actions" of the JIRA page.
>>
>> If you do not see your vote here, click the "Vote" link under the
>> "Operations" section of the JIRA page.
>>
>>
>>  *** ALL COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO VOTE ***
>>
>> Template: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gbuild/jirareports/patchesInRtc.vm 
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message