geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: Independently version transaction and connector
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:36:48 GMT
There's a ring of truth in these paragraphs.


Jason Dillon wrote:
> For the record, I do think that it is a good idea to split G up into 
> some smaller chunks... I am just concerned about how small the chunks 
> become and how it may eventually lead to chaos.... I've been there 
> before and would like to avoid it in the future.
> I am not against moving transaction and connector bits to separate 
> peer trees... I am just trying to avoid us moving all modules to 
> separate trees which would be a massive painful nightmare.  But, I 
> think that splitting off large/major chunks of G into versioned trees 
> is the right direction... just need to make sure it does not get out 
> of hand.
> --jason
>> On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>> What do everyone think about changing the transaction and connector 
>>> modules to be versioned independently of the main Geronimo server?
>>> -dain

View raw message