geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Terminology and status
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:53:41 GMT
Hash: SHA1

People have been referring to things requiring votes as

Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner.  RTC is a
development model; what it and CTR are concerned with are
patches.  Please call them patches.  Changes are patches;
RTC and CTR are how they get applied.  If you said something
about 'an RTC' outside Geronimo, no-one would have the least
idea what you were talking about.  This is *not* a place
where it's necessary for us to invent new nomenclature.

There has been some discussion about keeping status in
the wiki.  The wiki is a 'pull' mechanism; if you don't
actively go looking for it, you won't get it.  I have
updated the STATUS file in trunk from its incubation
content to something more current, and have set it up to
be mailed to the list every Wednesday night.  I suggest
filling things in there so all the various issues are
listed in a single places, along with who has voted on
patches, critical issues, etc.  Right now information is
scattered all over the place.

Take a look at (or at
if you prefer the full URL) to see how another project
uses the STATUS file as a central repository of such

If the consensus is to not use the STATUS file, that's
cool.  But I decided that *doing* it was more productive
that just proposing to possibly set it up.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


View raw message