geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: Independently version transaction and connector
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:17:55 GMT
Before we start moving components into separate trees, I hope we can  
think ahead a bit and consider a plan for how to organize chunks of  
components into a small set of trees.  I think that if we just pluck  
them off one by one as peers to trunk that we will end up with a  
messy svn repo.  I'd like to see those components organized into  
categories within our repo.

I'd also like to eventually do away with the top-level /trunk, /tags  
and /branches... and instead move that into a top-level tree... very  
similar to how the maven repo is:


On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> I can see the difficulty pointed out by Jason and the benefit  
> raised by Dain.  I've never liked versioning parts of Geronimo that  
> rarely change and am all for making things more consumable externally.
> The proposal as it stands is fairly generic.  Is the idea to  
> relocate Tx Manager and Connector to be top-level projects withing  
> Geronimo and build separately or some kind of hybrid in the current  
> tree.  If we are going to release them independently then I think  
> they should be top-level in Geronimo (and I know thats a lot more  
> work).
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> What do everyone think about changing the transaction and  
>> connector modules to be versioned independently of the main  
>> Geronimo server?
>> -dain

View raw message