Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of sanketsharma@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=rRRA3MUnqF1vJ3ecop0GIvnjiSEZVYQlZiExxmnUGnRv74mIJYhbxj2lb8itBWIItrmNoRLZyaP6ZPJhDG87ooXuOra0AaRPj8ywEzXCZQr1T3oxWAnJ9AndqreFjBz9vM3HStmIFdhTPitpKm+lw0fjyqbi+aKqTxTcIgrJWWI=
Message-ID: <d7dd95450607071546r24b0a57pa79acba5c56e6884@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 04:16:38 +0530
From: "Sanket Sharma" <sanketsharma@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Derby JMX and Geronimo
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I don't know if this is the right place to talk about this, but I'm
working on adding JMX to derby. I had certain doubts in mind regarding
the whole GBean and MBean thing (I'm sure this would have been asked
several times before).
Will my calls to ManagementFactory.getPlatformMBean() work inside
Geronimo? I dont see a reason for them to not work, but just wanted to
confirm.
Further, what is there an interoperability between GBeans and MBeans?
Can I expose my MBeans from inside an GBean to expose the
management/monitoring interface or do I need to code some extra
stuff??

If I have a Derby jar with JMX built into it, will it break Geronimo's code?

Any help will be greatly appriciated.

Best Regards,
Sanket Sharma

On 7/7/06, John Sisson <jrsisson@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the "Derby library does not have line number debug information" mail
> thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to upgrade to
> the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].
>
> David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in the 1.1.1
> release but did not hear any objections from others.  If anyone
> disagrees with this plan, please speak up before I start looking into
> this next week.
>
> John
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg25051.html
> [2]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-user/200607.mbox/%3c54ac72d70607051635r10e5e113u38b7993d6d677fc8@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
>