Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40893 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2006 02:28:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2006 02:28:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 53270 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2006 02:28:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53216 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2006 02:28:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53205 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2006 02:28:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:28:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.200] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:28:03 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 4so21747nzn for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender; b=OdZ8pmRN5csFoUoFMNXlqdAC653K4tVBwwB8zRjxydkviHMzAexdaDZ82p+zaQV/TD5cBqsBeDpaokQn4SJ2i5gFIcxNoT0L/YM1+yLpUOVSbFsn6s+Aypq6DDJ3EDBFMtV2dcpwFizI+Y43PRm7A7VaQ4Dk0c5ZCoLQS5+nntw= Received: by 10.36.33.8 with SMTP id g8mr294704nzg; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.104? ( [216.101.184.25]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p4sm165374nzc.2006.07.18.19.27.41; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <394BB123-129F-4BD2-9643-8FA97B984F08@gmail.com> References: <0509F175-DE38-4382-9DB7-4983F5ACA994@planet57.com> <44BD619A.5010105@toolazydogs.com> <46193519-402C-46C7-8695-C6B69315103F@planet57.com> <394BB123-129F-4BD2-9643-8FA97B984F08@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Corba specs for G 1.2 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:27:26 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) From: Jason Dillon Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e. > jacorb). "old" uses idlj (i.e. idlj compiler>). Any reason why we don't revert to use idlj on the new spec modules so we can use them? >> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we are >> using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found that the >> greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec. > > Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/ > trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version > is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/ Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version (1_0 tag) has newer artifactId's. --jason