Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender;
        b=Rfjdj/3fp6V4A+f6YnR1hiOFd6aRuywMD8MlHIelM1yO/5gZheJu+taryBYyUUkibmin4evLvwJZ8yb/MZhiYprxLGUQFuGuPhaLy2Qg95HLNpnFVJobovU1i8jhUBS9JuWU6457YB7h1OyJaoCEPhqBRbGz81659V+oF06Pux8=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <20060715112411.12964.qmail@web31708.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060715112411.12964.qmail@web31708.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <B3FE55B3-A6E6-4033-B6A6-B90B70DD63EE@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [m2 build] Update about custom assembly usage
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:02:27 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

Prasad, could you peek at the patches and help sort out what needs to  
get applied to m2migration?

Thanks,

--jason


On Jul 15, 2006, at 4:24 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:

> Hi Prasad,
>     I wish I could be of more help and investigate why the config are
> not building. These patches used to work until rev 418907 on the  
> trunk.
> I have been unable to build the trunk using 'mvn' after RTC-2161. I
> have not had time to investigate it. IIRC this error comes when the
> openejb-deployer config is bad.
>    I will have limited email access for the next 2 weeks.
>
> Cheers
> Anita
>
> --- Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anita,
>>
>> I applied the pending patch (geronimo-remote-deploy/pom.xml).  That
>> was when I got that error.  Are there are more patches to be applied
>> along with that ?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Prasad
>>
>> On 7/14/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>    Would it not be simpler to use the patched version of m-a-p and
>> just
>>> rename it to geronimo-assembly2-plugin and add it to our code base?
>>> This plugin is more elegant than the ant solution. we can remove
>> this
>>> code as soon as maven-assembly-plugin is updated. Are there any
>>> problems with using code like this?
>>>     BTW, I saw your comments about remote-deploy-* configs. These
>> are
>>> the pending patches at -
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067#action_12415761
>>>     I will be offline for next 2 weeks due to preplanned summer
>>> engagements.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Anita
>>>
>>> --- Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to take
>> in
>>>> our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides
>> mappers
>>>> and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related fix
>> to
>>>>
>>>> files/file element processing.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but for
>> now
>>>>
>>>> to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the
>> dependency
>>>>
>>>> plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed "flattening"
>> of
>>>> the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly.
>>>>
>>>> I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee
>> assembly in
>>>>
>>>> the svkmerge/m2migration branch.
>>>>
>>>> It appears to function as expected.  I've disabled the remaining
>>>> assemblies which have not yet been converted.  Once they have
>> been
>>>> converted they will be re-enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no longer
>> need
>>>>
>>>> to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2-
>>>> SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out
>>>> assemblies.
>>>>
>>>> The full conversation is here if anyone is interested:
>>>>
>>>>      http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714
>>>>
>>>> Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency +
>>>> antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly
>> plugin?'
>>>> --jason
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com