Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46490 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2006 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2006 14:08:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 42112 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2006 14:08:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42073 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2006 14:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42062 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2006 14:08:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:08:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of sppatel@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.227] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:08:47 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i7so744582wra for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=oasWOYBj20N3/yByBpQpDlo5sPJhQvk5e+/Zu8wVjf1icgqR/QtSS9c8FDdub8Z3fzIsRrwxIToq62r4WpT4RzuRzMy5XLZcf05uBEvHyA/Um8Y+RrsCXPLoox4mpAWEOfQLEdb4hETYqXhhSBPgOBXkWDXJgkcd1lohJwkLvU0= Received: by 10.54.153.2 with SMTP id a2mr3313060wre; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.27.40.41? ( [129.33.49.251]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 11sm69982wrl.2006.07.18.07.08.25; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <44BCE98E.9040602@gmail.com> References: <00bb01c6a50e$ee88dd70$81f22509@raleigh.ibm.com> <3E3CAC18-9063-4949-B7D5-DDA560A4A683@gmail.com> <6314DFEC-8DAD-4F1D-BC2D-601FA7E4417A@gmail.com> <44BCE98E.9040602@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-10-978333296 Message-Id: <89838004-C98E-4FFF-86F4-7D96DD50EEE9@gmail.com> From: Sachin Patel Subject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:08:28 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: Sachin Patel X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --Apple-Mail-10-978333296 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Thanks for your feedback, agree on all points. On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:00 AM, John Sisson wrote: > Installed eclipse 3.2, installed JST (J2EE Standard Tools and its > dependencies), pointed it to an existing geronimo installation and > created a J2EE project. I haven't had the time to read eclipse > tutorials on using the JST, so didn't build anything. > > Have you thought about using a tool like wink ( http:// > www.debugmode.com/wink/ ) to do a walkthrough of the functionality > to help get users started? I think it could really help get more > users/developers interested and spread your knowledge :-). > > IMHO we should at least have a draft of the release notes when > voting for a release and should be testing pretty much what our > users will see. AFAIK, there isn't any user documentation we can > look at for this release at the moment. > > I looked at the release notes for the previous release ( http:// > people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE- > NOTES-1.0.0.txt ) and have the following comments if it is to be > used as the basis for this release: > > * should mention JST is required. I tried just using WST and it > didn't work. > * describe what has changed other than the 8 bug fixes listed in > JIRA for this release > * describe what doesn't work completely - there was some mention of > things not completely implemented earlier in this thread > * mention help for dialogs during project creation isn't done > * limit line length in file to 80 chars for easy reading > > FYI just in case others run into problems updating eclipse 3.2 with > WST etc, I wasted a bit of time when I hit a bug with the eclipse > update processing when downloading from a local mirror. Added to > comments to issue https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi? > id=148886 . Trying the update with the main eclipse mirror site > worked ok. > > Regards, > John > > Sachin Patel wrote: >> Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. >> Please vote. >> >> On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: >>> >>>> FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software >>>> record on the number of release candidate drivers in one day) >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g- >>>> eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC10.zip >>>> >>> >>> Sachin, All the license/notices look good. I created/started a >>> server; created, deployed and tested a jsp. Looks good to me. >>> Nice work! >>> >>> Here's my non-binding +1. >>> >>> --kevan >> >> >> -sachin >> >> > -sachin --Apple-Mail-10-978333296 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for your feedback, agree = on all points.

On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:00 AM, John = Sisson wrote:

Installed eclipse 3.2, installed = JST (J2EE Standard Tools and its dependencies), pointed it to an = existing geronimo installation and created a J2EE project.=A0 I haven't had the time to = read eclipse tutorials on using the JST, so didn't build = anything.

Have you thought about using a tool like wink ( http://www.debugmode.com/wink/= ) to do a walkthrough of the functionality to help get users = started?=A0 I think it = could really help get more users/developers interested and spread your = knowledge :-).

IMHO we should at least have a draft of the release = notes when voting for a release and should be testing pretty much what = our users will see.=A0 = AFAIK, there isn't any user documentation we can look at for this = release at the moment.
I looked at the release notes = for the previous release ( http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE= -NOTES-1.0.0.txt ) and have the following comments if it is to be = used as the basis for this release:

* should mention JST is = required.=A0 I tried just = using WST and it didn't work.
* describe = what has changed other than the 8 bug fixes listed in JIRA for this = release
* describe what doesn't work = completely - there was some mention of things not completely implemented = earlier in this thread
* mention help for dialogs = during project creation isn't done
* limit line = length in file to 80 chars for easy reading

FYI just in = case others run into problems updating eclipse 3.2 with WST etc, I = wasted a bit of time when I hit a bug with the eclipse update processing = when downloading from a local mirror.=A0 Added to comments to issue https://bu= gs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D148886 . =A0 Trying the update with the = main eclipse mirror site worked ok.

Regards,
John

Sachin Patel wrote:
=
Folks, its been almost a = week and I still have 0 binding votes.=A0 Please vote.

On Jul = 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:


On Jul = 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time = software record on the number of release candidate drivers in one = day)



Sachin, All = the license/notices look good. I created/started a server; created, = deployed and tested a jsp. Looks good to me. Nice work!

Here's = my non-binding +1.
--kevan =A0





=


-sachin
 =

= --Apple-Mail-10-978333296--