Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46749 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2006 20:32:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2006 20:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 19527 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2006 20:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 19476 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2006 20:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 19460 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2006 20:32:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 13:32:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.232] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 13:32:13 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i12so780982wra for ; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 13:31:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender; b=mL617txM8Ql3bJc0UZP9TMaF8Adp/r1KR2dq3ewhEx1o5B013/gAHg41PIfXhb2PvQDhRzBF9zTAoU5IvLTpNvOenswcgXoOO+c2fg8cj/JBpUblsxgzGU2Bo2IVUVrMld3QoXSsURP+K4CbZoSLGdSCfJIzXFsaEFchtOt2jJw= Received: by 10.54.62.8 with SMTP id k8mr3427978wra; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 13:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.5? ( [67.180.143.96]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 64sm3413135wra.2006.07.02.13.31.49; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 13:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <44A8154A.1010003@toolazydogs.com> References: <0128DA23-916A-48A6-8C61-3180A2E6D695@visi.com> <71089A50-F27B-496D-91F2-039C47FAB7D0@planet57.com> <44A8154A.1010003@toolazydogs.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--381077395 Message-Id: <5AD4EA58-1939-4B26-BC8E-4C7401FC75F9@planet57.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:31:38 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) From: Jason Dillon Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --Apple-Mail-6--381077395 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Jason, IIUC, Mohammed is asking if it is not better to have OpenEJB > separate from Geronimo, not together. Your plus one seems to be at > odds w/ your subsequent statements. Am I misunderstanding something? Sorry... my +1 is for the proposal. I've snipped out any confusing bits below... --jason > Jason Dillon wrote: >> +1 >> >> Most of the OpenEJB developers are Geronimo developers, so it >> really makes sense to bring these two codebases together. >> >> I don't see any problem with OpenEJB coming together with Geronimo >> regarding to allow others to use the OpenEJB core w/o the rest of >> Geronimo. I believe that one of the key drives within Geronimo is >> to make it highly flexible and pluggable. Many components are >> already in use by other projects (and OpenEJB) itself) with out >> requiring the entire server. >> >> There merger of these two groups will almost certainly result in a >> more functional OpenEJB, which means a more functional Geronimo. >>> On 12/3/05, David Blevins wrote: >>> The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a >>> Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal >>> >>> Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB >>> during incubation >>> >>> [ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation >>> as a >>> sub-project of Geronimo >>> [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way >>> [ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________ >>> >>> +1 from me >>> >>> -- >>> David --Apple-Mail-6--381077395 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Jul 2, 2006, at = 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jason, = IIUC, Mohammed is asking if it is not better to have OpenEJB separate = from Geronimo, not together.=A0 Your plus one seems to be at odds w/ = your subsequent statements.=A0 Am I misunderstanding = something?

Sorry... my +1 is for the = proposal.

I've = snipped out any confusing bits below...

--jason


Jason Dillon wrote:
+1

=
Most of the OpenEJB developers are Geronimo developers, so it = really makes sense to bring these two codebases together.
=

I don't see = any problem with OpenEJB coming together with Geronimo=A0regarding to = allow others to use the OpenEJB core w/o the rest of Geronimo.=A0 I = believe that one of the key drives within Geronimo is to make it highly = flexible and pluggable.=A0 Many components are already in use by other = projects (and OpenEJB) itself) with out requiring the entire = server.

=
There merger of these two groups will almost certainly result in a = more functional OpenEJB, which means a more functional = Geronimo.

On 12/3/05, David = Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> = wrote:
The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become = a
Geronimo sub-project.=A0=A0The incubator proposl is here:
=
http://wiki.apac= he.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal

Please vote if you'd = like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB
during incubation
=
[ ] +1 =3D I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation = as a
sub-project of Geronimo
[ ] +0 =3D I don't mind either = way
[ ] -1 =3D I don't support this move because: = _______________

+1 from me

--
= David



= --Apple-Mail-6--381077395--