Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68655 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2006 23:36:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2006 23:36:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 86575 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2006 23:36:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86541 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2006 23:36:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86530 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2006 23:36:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:36:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.181.65.237] (HELO sun.savoirtech.com) (209.181.65.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:36:46 -0700 Received: from [206.197.197.22] ([206.197.197.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by sun.savoirtech.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6ONaGkD026924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:36:16 -0600 Message-ID: <44C559F7.8060007@apache.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:38:31 -0600 From: Jeff Genender Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org Organization: Apache Geronimo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk References: <1b5bfeb50607240102o13f5a563h7bc7c823e254fef5@mail.gmail.com> <22DECB18-439D-4485-ACFC-80B12243C737@planet57.com> <1b5bfeb50607240116t6f4785a3p859fb6a930c83f2a@mail.gmail.com> <1b5bfeb50607240211y779e1282m52e89bec36a42ae0@mail.gmail.com> <219AE771-07CF-45CF-8160-F4150920A39C@planet57.com> <1b5bfeb50607241511s1ed0d5f3ob70aaaa9792dc536@mail.gmail.com> <09745891-A6F2-4A21-8DD7-0E92DDC47EE6@planet57.com> <44C54FEA.5010409@apache.org> <74e15baa0607241607r606d3305l7cc538b862ea05aa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0607241607r606d3305l7cc538b862ea05aa@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on sun.savoirtech.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/1616/Mon Jul 24 11:49:29 2006 on sun.savoirtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.1 required=5.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.6 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Aaron Mulder wrote: > On 7/24/06, Jeff Genender wrote: >> Do you think you could answer your peers a little bit more >> constructively? Your answers to people are a bit caustic and it is not >> helping promote a healthy environment. Is there something that we can >> help with to aid in a more amicable interaction with your peers? > > Give me a break! I find talking down to someone like this far more > offensive than Jason's messages on this thread. > > It's clear Jason is frustrated. That's OK, it happens to the best of > us every now and then. I think your response is totally > inappropriate. If anything, perhaps, take a break and let's take this > up again tomorrow. Or yell at me for baiting him if you like. But > don't talk down to him -- after all, "he's your peer". :) > It would appear you have read tone or something communicative that was not in my intended message to Jason. Talking down was certainly not my intention. It was truly an offer of help or at least to gage what we can do to communicate better with each other. I am sorry you read this differently than its intention. However, I think that the way you are addressing your concern can probably use a bit of work too, Aaron. ;-) > Thanks, > Aaron > >> Jason Dillon wrote: >> >> I don't understand why it hasn't been reported in JIRA? An issue is >> >> not known unless it's reported in JIRA where people (like me) can >> >> notice it. I don't think the community follows each and every thread >> >> that's in dev@, so how could they know about it? >> > >> > So, for the 3rd time... file an issue. >> > >> > >> >>> Really don't understand why we have to bounce back and forth for >> >>> several days to get something done. For example, I asked you for the >> >>> "length path" you ran under... and instead of actually giving me the >> >>> path which I asked for you, you give some explanation of why you were >> >>> in the lengthy past which I did not even ask for. >> >> >> >> I'm sounding as repeating myself, but as I didn't get the point I >> >> didn't respond as you requested. I believe the answer above is >> >> sufficient. As you wished ;-) >> > >> > How else would one answer the question "What is the lengthy path you >> ran >> > under?" except with the exact *lengthy path*? >> > >> > --jason >>