Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28608 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2006 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2006 19:02:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 80811 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2006 19:02:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80762 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2006 19:02:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80751 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2006 19:02:00 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:02:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:01:59 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so324554nfc for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender; b=F/XHCXk/+FCS9q3PTng75w1tgDK/a0hJTeSO59Bde1dZW+QrOhGBFQ4jq4m9Ksk7p2s/YCSIllSynUws3zYOAwu4gXLyUtJ876IBdx4ueVSNGU+yZ3cZvLC2qavV6NPgX3cqwiY4hdnFHg3ejkQ2xmx+9t3UcGWi25E2dAoZSa0= Received: by 10.48.48.18 with SMTP id v18mr1103700nfv; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.3? ( [24.7.69.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i19sm10759120wxd.2006.07.25.12.01.36; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--546789693 Message-Id: <3DB5EF0D-D4E9-4539-B6A1-D39FA00E9F26@planet57.com> Subject: Re: JIRAs adopter query/policy? Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:01:09 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) From: Jason Dillon Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --Apple-Mail-8--546789693 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I don't understand exactly what "adopter required" means. Someone is required to adopt the issue? I don't get it :-( I also don't see how companies/customers should get any such entity status in jira for an open source project. Does one need to give more priority to an issue from IBM than an issue submitted by joe user? I don't think so... at least not based on that critical alone. --jason On Jul 25, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: > As the Geronimo user base grows, it is important that we be able to > distinguish between JIRAs open during a development cycle to those > that are being hit in the field or requested by companies who > either use Geronimo or build products and or plugins on top of it. > So I suggest we provide a restricted "adopter required" field in > JIRA. This adopter field would be exposed to JIRA users who > request and identify themselves as adopters. So just like our > query for available patches, we can easily query these and help > ensure that these issues that companies face get the necessary > attention and help resolve them faster then they would be otherwise. > > Thoughts? > > -sachin > > --Apple-Mail-8--546789693 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't understand exactly what = "adopter required" means.=A0 Someone is required to adopt the issue?=A0 = I don't get it :-(

I = also don't see how companies/customers should get any such entity status = in jira for an open source project.=A0 Does one need to give more = priority to an issue from IBM than an issue submitted by joe user?=A0 I = don't think so... at least not based on that=A0critical = alone.

--jason


On Jul 25, = 2006, at 11:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:

As the = Geronimo user base grows, it is important that we be able to distinguish = between JIRAs open during a development cycle to those that are being = hit in the field or requested by companies who either use Geronimo or = build products and or plugins on top of it.=A0 So I suggest we provide a = restricted "adopter required" field in JIRA.=A0 This adopter field would = be exposed to JIRA users who request and identify themselves as = adopters.=A0 So just like our query for available patches,=A0we can = easily query these and help ensure that these issues that companies face = get the necessary attention and help resolve them faster then they would = be otherwise.

Thoughts?

-sachin
 =


= --Apple-Mail-8--546789693--