Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8509 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2006 13:49:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2006 13:49:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 75420 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 13:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 75383 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 13:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 75372 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2006 13:48:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:48:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [143.182.124.21] (HELO azsmga101-1.ch.intel.com) (143.182.124.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:48:57 -0700 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101-1.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2006 06:48:37 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx334.fm.intel.com (HELO fmsmsx334.amr.corp.intel.com) ([132.233.42.1]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2006 06:48:37 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,251,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="67006347:sNHT29495921" Received: from fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.227]) by fmsmsx334.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:48:34 -0700 Received: from mssmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.125.2.10]) by fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:48:34 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Transaction isolation level in TranQL Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:48:31 +0400 Message-ID: <3D8E84095C6A524A985B787423094E4010C11E@mssmsx411> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Transaction isolation level in TranQL thread-index: Acape3ZlUohgY9gwR7yiR/WLTzgNWQAJvCUw From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2006 13:48:34.0536 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2762E80:01C6A9A7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Matt, What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the transaction isolation level in TranQL? I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a successful SPECjAppServer2004 run... Recently you said (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html) that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right? Thank you! Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division