Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-33016-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96969 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2006 12:21:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2006 12:21:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 72657 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2006 12:21:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72615 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2006 12:21:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72598 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2006 12:21:31 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:21:31 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [68.142.201.193] (HELO web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com)
 (68.142.201.193)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:21:30 -0700
Received: (qmail 79597 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jul 2006 12:21:09 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=aATWFcBR6UEpkqwFnY+CjQf3F+mHHYIugV1mU/UBMDLLKYnPNumcCGqVMfQtLFlRRoi1c9GN5LQHNmR+GO+ZFAbkRswrrx/Vd1A6VnGGVUljxpP9tfVY28jM3+FJaVGXmdu3um8J5UPTijOKEjMR94sf4RPO7VAG3cwS8UqfX40=
  ;
Message-ID: <20060704122109.79595.qmail@web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.211.208.98] by web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
 Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:21:09 PDT
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 05:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Openejb build for Geronimo
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <FCAA5A37-3850-47E1-B5A7-575607E233C0@planet57.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

   The openejb rev 2721 does not build as is. There are many other
versions which need to be changed. I have attached a refreshed patch to

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2066. 

Thanks
Anita

--- Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:

> Attached is a patch that changes the TranQL versions to 1.3-SNAPSHOT 
> 
> and 1.4-SNAPSHOT as well as adds the correct SCM tags (so we can  
> build from Continuum) and introduces a root pom (most of the config  
> moved from modules/pom.xml).
> 
> --jason
> 
> > 
> 
> On Jul 3, 2006, at 8:02 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >     The rev 2720 of openejb at
> > https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2 is using wrong  
> > versions
> > of tranql and activation Spec. Here are the values from
> > etc/project.properties -
> >
> > tranql_version=1.4-SNAPSHOT
> > tranql_connector_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
> > tranql_vendors_version=1.1
> > ...................................
> > ...................................
> > geronimo_spec_activation_version=1.1
> >
> >    Here are the values from modules/pom.xml -
> >
> > <geronimoSpecActivationVersion>1.0</geronimoSpecActivationVersion>
> > ................................................................
> > <tranqlConnectorVersion>1.2-SNAPSHOT</tranqlConnectorVersion>
> >         <tranqlVendorsVersion>1.1</tranqlVendorsVersion>
> >         <tranqlVersion>1.3-SNAPSHOT</tranqlVersion>
> >      Could someone please update these and add the missing
> > g-dependency.xml to openejb-builder.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com