geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [m2 build] Update about custom assembly usage
Date Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:43:05 GMT
The timer tests failed. Jason, I thought you pulled them out late last
night after our discussion.

Cheers
Prasad

On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> The bootstrap on linux first failed a test in the security module. I
> ran the build inside the security module. It passed successfully.
>
> Then I ran bootstrap again. It failed while transferring an artifact.
>
> Now I'm running mvn from top level. This is running.
>
>
> Keeping my fingers crossed
> Prasad
>
> On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly fine.
> > I even ran the jetty binary successfully.
> >
> > Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the
> > dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we can prune
> > the deps list to remove the redudant ones.
> >
> > A full extract and bootstrap on Linux is running.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 7/14/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > > It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to take in
> > > our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides mappers
> > > and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related fix to
> > > files/file element processing.
> > >
> > > I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but for now
> > > to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the dependency
> > > plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed "flattening" of
> > > the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly.
> > >
> > > I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee assembly in
> > > the svkmerge/m2migration branch.
> > >
> > > It appears to function as expected.  I've disabled the remaining
> > > assemblies which have not yet been converted.  Once they have been
> > > converted they will be re-enabled.
> > >
> > > Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no longer need
> > > to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2-
> > > SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out assemblies.
> > >
> > > The full conversation is here if anyone is interested:
> > >
> > >      http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714
> > >
> > > Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency +
> > > antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly plugin?'
> > > --jason
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message