geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [m2 build] Update about custom assembly usage
Date Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:24:47 GMT
The bootstrap on linux first failed a test in the security module. I
ran the build inside the security module. It passed successfully.

Then I ran bootstrap again. It failed while transferring an artifact.

Now I'm running mvn from top level. This is running.


Keeping my fingers crossed
Prasad

On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly fine.
> I even ran the jetty binary successfully.
>
> Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the
> dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we can prune
> the deps list to remove the redudant ones.
>
> A full extract and bootstrap on Linux is running.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 7/14/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to take in
> > our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides mappers
> > and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related fix to
> > files/file element processing.
> >
> > I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but for now
> > to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the dependency
> > plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed "flattening" of
> > the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly.
> >
> > I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee assembly in
> > the svkmerge/m2migration branch.
> >
> > It appears to function as expected.  I've disabled the remaining
> > assemblies which have not yet been converted.  Once they have been
> > converted they will be re-enabled.
> >
> > Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no longer need
> > to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2-
> > SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out assemblies.
> >
> > The full conversation is here if anyone is interested:
> >
> >      http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714
> >
> > Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency +
> > antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly plugin?'
> > --jason
> >
>

Mime
View raw message