geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [m2 build] Update about custom assembly usage
Date Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:09:44 GMT
Hi Anita,

I applied the pending patch (geronimo-remote-deploy/pom.xml).  That
was when I got that error.  Are there are more patches to be applied
along with that ?

Cheers
Prasad

On 7/14/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
>    Would it not be simpler to use the patched version of m-a-p and just
> rename it to geronimo-assembly2-plugin and add it to our code base?
> This plugin is more elegant than the ant solution. we can remove this
> code as soon as maven-assembly-plugin is updated. Are there any
> problems with using code like this?
>     BTW, I saw your comments about remote-deploy-* configs. These are
> the pending patches at -
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067#action_12415761
>     I will be offline for next 2 weeks due to preplanned summer
> engagements.
>
> Cheers
> Anita
>
> --- Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> > It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to take in
> > our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides mappers
> > and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related fix to
> >
> > files/file element processing.
> >
> > I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but for now
> >
> > to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the dependency
> >
> > plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed "flattening" of
> > the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly.
> >
> > I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee assembly in
> >
> > the svkmerge/m2migration branch.
> >
> > It appears to function as expected.  I've disabled the remaining
> > assemblies which have not yet been converted.  Once they have been
> > converted they will be re-enabled.
> >
> > Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no longer need
> >
> > to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2-
> > SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out
> > assemblies.
> >
> > The full conversation is here if anyone is interested:
> >
> >      http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714
> >
> > Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency +
> > antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly plugin?'
> > --jason
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Mime
View raw message