geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RTC] Vote restart on 2 javamail patches
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:49:16 GMT
I've reviewed, applied, and built the patches.  +1

On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> Rick,
>
> I have reviewed your patches and they appear fine to me.
>
> You get my +1.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now  
>> with
>> no activity.  The only votes received so far have been non-binding
>> ones.  These changes are holding up other work, including trying to
>> convince the James developers to convert to using the Geronimo  
>> javamail
>> version.
>>
>> First issue, removing the javamail-transport module and replacing it
>> with a dependency on the javamail-provider jar.
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
>>
>> NOTE:  The above patch is another example of an area where svn  
>> diff and
>> patch don't work well together.  Applying this patch will prompt  
>> for a
>> Reverse action on the patch.  It doesn't matter how you reply,  
>> because
>> after the patch applies, delete the javamail-transport module
>> subdirectory, and this should build ok.
>>
>> Second issue, creating a new javamail 1.4 spec jar.
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2148
>>
>> Rick
>>


-sachin



Mime
View raw message