geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Date Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:26:28 GMT
Um... I have no clue when it comes to developing with Corba... and  
hope not to need to start ;-)

--jason


On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I was going to JIRA this but figured since there is a conversation  
> going on about the geronimo-spec-corba_2.3_spec jar I'd just post  
> first and then jira...
>
> The CosNaming.NamingContext interface currently has the destroy  
> method commented out with a statement that its 'not implemented  
> yet'. Not sure if that is a hold over from trying to get things  
> working with the Sun corba impl or not but I figured I'd mention it  
> here and see if its already known or if a JIRA would be a good thing.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> One more thing is to uncomment the destroy method on the  
> CosNaming.NamingContext interface.
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.  
>>> <compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e.  
>>> <compiler>idlj</compiler>).
>>
>> Any reason why we don't revert to use <compiler>idlj</compiler> on  
>> the new spec modules so we can use them?
>>
>>
>>>> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we  
>>>> are using?  I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found  
>>>> that the greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo- 
>>>> corba_2.3_spec.
>>>
>>> Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/ 
>>> trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version  
>>> is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
>>
>> Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version  
>> (1_0 tag) has newer artifactId's.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>


Mime
View raw message