geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-1738) Plugin migration to Maven 2: geronimo-deployment-plugin
Date Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:39:24 GMT
The issue is only resolved at the moment... close it when it moves to  
trunk.

But lets not argue over semantics in this time.

We are trying to use JIRA to track what needs to be done.

--jason


On Jul 20, 2006, at 2:52 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 7/20/06, Prasad Kashyap (JIRA) <dev@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738?page=all ]
>>
>> Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-1738.
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>>     Fix Version/s: 1.2
>>        Resolution: Fixed
>>
>> Let's mark this fixed. The patch has gone into the sandbox/ 
>> svkmerge/m2migration. The whole branch will be up for RTC review  
>> anyway.
>
> I disagree. Let's try to define when an issue is fixed. Let's face
> what our end users face. If an end user consulted the issue today,
> what would (s)he be left with? The answer is that (s)he will think
> that the issue's fixed (I don't assume (s)he will eventually read the
> description and draw his/her conclusion). This leads us to the
> question whether it's really true. I believe, most if not all say that
> it is not. Unless I'm mistaken in my thinking, I'd ask for re-opening
> the issue and close it only when the patches have really been applied
> to the trunk. As a matter of fact, we don't know yet when the svkmerge
> branch will be merged so we don't really know what version the issue
> is fixed in, do we?
>
> Jacek
>
> -- 
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.net.pl


Mime
View raw message