On Jul 17, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
> I agree.
>
> Is there a way to import a project into Continuum and only have a
> single project created using the root pom that does a full build,
> rather then one for every pom?
Well, you can always add as a "shell" project, rather than as maven 1
or 2 project. That's how a fair number of our existing projects were
added.
--kevan
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Hey Jason,
>> These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For
>> example the "Geronimo 1.2 :: Configs" build used geronimo/configs.
>> So, at the moment the configs, applications, and assembly phases
>> of the G 1.2 build are broken.
>>
>> I've never really cared for separating the build steps on
>> Continuum (eg, modules, applications, configs, and assembly). I
>> don't think separating them gives us much, if any benefit, and may
>> actually cause some confusion... AFAIK, there's nothing that
>> insures subsequent build phases (e.g. assembly) runs after a
>> modules build. Also, I don't think there's anything to insure
>> proper build order -- I'd hacked the current projects to build in
>> the proper order by renaming the assembly project to "Z Assembly".
>> I'd just as soon always run a full build even if only a config
>> plan has changed.
>>
>> So, unless I hear any objections. I'm going to delete the existing
>> Continuum Geronimo 1.2 projects and have just one Geronimo 1.2
>> project that runs a full Geronimo build.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:45 AM, jdillon@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: jdillon
>>> Date: Sun Jul 16 23:45:15 2006
>>> New Revision: 422640
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=422640&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Drop this unused path
>>>
>>> Removed:
>>> geronimo/configs/
>>>
>>
>
>
> -sachin
>
>
|