geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: [RTC] Vote on GERONIMO-2161 - restart 1
Date Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:14:23 GMT
I do not believe that your suggestion to have the final voter commit  
patches will improve collaboration.  I see that by adding another  
layer of process only adds to the chances that the overall process  
will fail... and IMO taking too long is a failure.

I am open to ideas about how to improve how we work with RTC, but I  
don't see that your suggestion would be beneficial enough to warrant  
the additional overhead to manage the process.


On Jul 7, 2006, at 1:00 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 7/7/06, Jason Dillon <> wrote:
>> -1 to this and any other way ways to slow down progress.
>> We need to find more effective ways to work with RTC, not more ways
>> to put up road blocks.
> -1 requires more than just a thought or doubt. I don't see how it
> could slow down a process more than it is now? What's wrong with it? I
> see only positives no negatives wrt the 'branch' plan. Quoting your
> words (slightly changed): our committer base is too low to compete in
> the market and any way to improve it is worth to consider.
> To be honest, I'm going to -1 any other change that doesn't apply
> gently and can be tested on a fresh, clean local Geronimo sources
> copy. It will cost us more time to cut better changes and me to help
> with their preparation and testing, but will do it if necessary - in
> the name of improving our collaboration.
> Jacek
> -- 
> Jacek Laskowski

View raw message