geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r422640 - /geronimo/configs/
Date Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:12:11 GMT
I agree.

Is there a way to import a project into Continuum and only have a  
single project created using the root pom that does a full build,  
rather then one for every pom?

On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> Hey Jason,
> These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For  
> example the "Geronimo 1.2 :: Configs" build used geronimo/configs.  
> So, at the moment the configs, applications, and assembly phases of  
> the G 1.2 build are broken.
>
> I've never really cared for separating the build steps on Continuum  
> (eg, modules, applications, configs, and assembly). I don't think  
> separating them gives us much, if any benefit, and may actually  
> cause some confusion... AFAIK, there's nothing that insures  
> subsequent build phases (e.g. assembly)  runs after a modules  
> build. Also, I don't think there's anything to insure proper build  
> order -- I'd hacked the current projects to build in the proper  
> order by renaming the assembly project to "Z Assembly". I'd just as  
> soon always run a full build even if only a config plan has changed.
>
> So, unless I hear any objections. I'm going to delete the existing  
> Continuum Geronimo 1.2 projects and have just one Geronimo 1.2  
> project that runs a full Geronimo build.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:45 AM, jdillon@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: jdillon
>> Date: Sun Jul 16 23:45:15 2006
>> New Revision: 422640
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=422640&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Drop this unused path
>>
>> Removed:
>>     geronimo/configs/
>>
>


-sachin



Mime
View raw message