geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Mulder" <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Removal of TransactionContextManager
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:14:24 GMT
On 7/31/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> > +1, so long as the threads are still coming from a Geronimo thread
> > pool under the covers (even if its hidden by the concurrent executor
> > interface).  I'd really like to have more components using Geronimo
> > thread pools rather than fewer, since right now there's really no way
> > to view or manage all the threads in the server.
>
> Absolutely!  The Geronimo standalone servers still supply a Geronimo
> thread pool to the work manager, but now third parties can make the
> same demands on our code (i.e., they want to use their own pools).
> For example, in the Jencks project we simply supply new PooledExecutor
> (threadPoolSize).

Great!

Thanks,
    Aaron

Mime
View raw message