geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Mulder" <>
Subject Re: VMware on GBuild?
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:09:26 GMT
On 7/28/06, Jason Dillon <> wrote:
> Why not use Xen ( )?

Because I understand that it's sensitive to the host OS and I don't
want to fool with it.

> If you just plan to use VMWare workstation, then chances are you are
> going to be wasting a bunch of cycles.  Would be better to just run
> multiple instances of Geronimo.

No, was going to use VMware Server.   It's now final and free.

If I thought it was going to be possible to have multiple TCKs running
simultaneously, I would, but that seems to be such a massive
undertaking that I'm not willing to do it myself.  Do you think it's
easier than I'm speculating?

> I've had really bad luck with VMWare in the past so I am a bit jaded
> to using it.  Previously we had a big box running ESX, and a few
> virtual machines on it.  We setup our main build/ci server as one of
> them... and it was so slow.... the vm had 100% utilization, but the
> host was only at like 20%.

I've had pretty good experience with VMware Server.  Very low overhead
and no limits like you're describing.  It did seem that a database
server suffered a little, but it was still quite usable, and I don't
think the TCK does major disk access like that.


> On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > I'm interested in setting up VMware Server on my GBuild boxes, since
> > my understanding is that the TCK is pretty single-threaded and we
> > ought to get better utilization out of the (dual-CPU) machines if we
> > ran the host plus one VM or just two VMs (and forget about the host)
> > on each box.
> >
> > It sounds like memory might be the constraining feature -- my boxes
> > have 1.5, 2, and 4 GB respectively and I wonder whether splitting the
> > smaller ones in half would leave enough RAM for the TCK to run.  Would
> > 512 or 768 be enough?
> >
> > The other question is IPs.  I only have 3 IPs.  Is there any way for
> > me to put all the boxes/VMs behind a NAT and have them share 1 IP with
> > various port forwards, or do they really need to each have a public
> > IP?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >     Aaron

View raw message