geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo
Date Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:31:38 GMT
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Jason, IIUC, Mohammed is asking if it is not better to have OpenEJB  
> separate from Geronimo, not together.  Your plus one seems to be at  
> odds w/ your subsequent statements.  Am I misunderstanding something?

Sorry... my +1 is for the proposal.

I've snipped out any confusing bits below...

--jason


> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Most of the OpenEJB developers are Geronimo developers, so it  
>> really makes sense to bring these two codebases together.
>>
>> I don't see any problem with OpenEJB coming together with Geronimo  
>> regarding to allow others to use the OpenEJB core w/o the rest of  
>> Geronimo.  I believe that one of the key drives within Geronimo is  
>> to make it highly flexible and pluggable.  Many components are  
>> already in use by other projects (and OpenEJB) itself) with out  
>> requiring the entire server.
>>
>> There merger of these two groups will almost certainly result in a  
>> more functional OpenEJB, which means a more functional Geronimo.

>>> On 12/3/05, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>>> The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a
>>> Geronimo sub-project.  The incubator proposl is here:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
>>>
>>> Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB
>>> during incubation
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation  
>>> as a
>>> sub-project of Geronimo
>>> [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
>>> [ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________
>>>
>>> +1 from me
>>>
>>> --
>>> David




Mime
View raw message