geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: [RTC] Vote restart on 2 javamail patches
Date Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:44:10 GMT
+1

I looked at them Rick and they look fine.  I'm not a javamail guy so I can't comment on that
aspect.

Applied and built.

Rick McGuire wrote:
> These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now with 
> no activity.  The only votes received so far have been non-binding 
> ones.  These changes are holding up other work, including trying to 
> convince the James developers to convert to using the Geronimo javamail 
> version.
> 
> First issue, removing the javamail-transport module and replacing it 
> with a dependency on the javamail-provider jar.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
> 
> NOTE:  The above patch is another example of an area where svn diff and 
> patch don't work well together.  Applying this patch will prompt for a 
> Reverse action on the patch.  It doesn't matter how you reply, because 
> after the patch applies, delete the javamail-transport module 
> subdirectory, and this should build ok.
> 
> Second issue, creating a new javamail 1.4 spec jar.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2148
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message