Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> I'd recommend that projects using m2 wait for G 1.2, which will
>> hopefully be sooner rather than later.
>
> Too late. For example, the Quartz plugin (already available on the
> plugin repo) uses G 1.1 and Maven 2. I've been copying JARs around by
> hand, which is annoying, and why I want to solve this. There are more
> people getting involved in developing plugins, and it's hard to
> recommend Maven 1 and hard to recommend file copying (and *extra* hard
> to recommend waiting for Geronimo 1.2, given the current velocity).
You shouldn't need to hand copy M1 jars into an M2 repository. If the
repository declaration is correctly set up, Maven 2 will use the M1 jars
in an M1 repository.
>> If a project is using m2 and can't wait for G 1.2, then it should
>> setup a legacy repo and use the m1 artifacts.
>
> OK, that's fine, but should it use the groupId "geronimo" or
> "org.apache.geronimo.modules" when referring to, e.g.,
> geronimo-kernel?
The groupId geronimo refers to the m1 jars and
org.apache.geronimo.modules will refer to the m2 jars.
Regards,
Alan
|