geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <>
Subject Re: [RTC] Vote on GERONIMO-2161 - restart 1
Date Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:40:28 GMT
Hey Jacek,

BTW, I apologize about the blessing of the final 3 +1s within the 18
hours period.  I did not mean to go against your statement.  I just
recalled an email about 3 +1s allowed it to happen and there was no need
to wait...that a -1 could be waged at anytime in the future.  If I
stepped over the line here, then my complete apologies.  I think I may
be trying to feel my way through this as well...and I may bump into a
wall every now and then.


Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 7/7/06, Jason Dillon <> wrote:
>> This is applied.
>> :-)
>> Took longer than expected because I happened to switch to a terminal
>> that was set to use JDK 1.5 and I did not realize it... until a few
>> hours later after I was pulling my hair out wondering why the patch
>> god hates me so much.
> It's because it needs a solution as I think you won't be alone in your
> pain of applying patches/changes that are incompatible with the unix
> patch command.
> I think it would be much better if the person who makes a change is
> not the one who commits it to trunk, but the last PMCer who voted for
> it. And a branch the change is built from is established. The solution
> has such a good effect that the person who works on changes don't have
> to worry about the commit date until it's rejected when (s)he or
> anyone else will fix it and a vote starts over (with 24-hour time
> period). Another good effect is that knowing the revisions a change
> that's being voted, one can continue his/her work without worrying
> about disrupting the vote process as the revisions are still in the
> branch. Phew, I do like the idea! ;-)
>> --jason
> Jacek

View raw message