geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: Need clarification on RTC... Yet again... was: [Proposal] Tracking the status of patches under RTC
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:02:18 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I do not believe the +1's need to be from PMC members but other
> committers.  This is a snippet from Ken's personal web page:
> 
> "Consequently, acting ex officio my VP/chair of Apache Geronimo role,
> yesterday (Sunday, 21 May 2006) I changed the project's development
> model from CTR (Commit-Then-Review) to RTC (Review-Then-Commit). This
> means that all code changes that aren't to documentation or specific
> bug fixes must be proposed to the development list as patches, and
> three *[other] committers* need to verify them and vote in favour of
> them before they can be applied to the code in the repository. (This
> doesn't apply to the sandboxes and experimental areas, only the main
> lines and branches of development.)"
> 
> In Ken's original e-mail the vote required three other committers and
> not specifically PMC members.

I was mistaken.  See http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary#Vote
If all committers are on the PMC, the distinction vanishes -- but
we do not have that situation.

I apologise for the confusion.
- --
#ken	P-|}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRKvwmprNPMCpn3XdAQKPBAP/f9gq3fnJ/mL1mKC0yUwm84z4RDUa2Ts4
C/a8Kgc25BiIS6YNCCvAPYN1e0WDMpCtNEa6m7sgeel9xytjYm9ZKFaVZ+P4nMts
FTcgdR8quFv7TZpMfCd/hbOPUujRF8/aHlr8sqJI0/wGA2lgJHdooo6tx3H/8ROC
TLFdg1lQns8=
=f5Hn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message